07/29/2017

NEXT POST
Teachers' Day: Questions For Those Who Teach Do you know your students? Have you walked from his hand in the paths of their dreams? Have you found when knocked on your door, urged by despair, or driven by the longing to share their difficulties with someone? Did you say yes when I asked for some time to pour into his life some of your wisdom or your infinite capacity to give affection? Do you recognize him as a transit passenger to glory or consider one more in the long procession of men without hope that target at the horizon hopelessly confused of anonymity? Do you think your job as a challenge to your ability every day makes the master or judge as a freak accident in your life? Do you enjoy the questions for which you do not find an answer or you get frustrated when you feel that those people who intend to teach can learn more than you? You see in every event in the history an opportunity to learn and to teach a lesson? Do you take any reading with the eyes of master and read while you think about way they apply to your students? Do you miss your everyday space of the classroom, laboratory and class when you're dedicated to other tasks? Would you be willing to decline any tempting offer if it meant you give your disciples? Are you ready to build new worlds each day where love of neighbor is not a fantasy and the welfare of the people are not just imaginary? Do you believe in humankind and its infinite potential to improve and close to perfection? Your faith is enough to believe that seemingly impossible can build worlds where love prevails over hatred, the bitterness and affection on the appreciation of the resentment? Have you thought about whether...
PREVIOUS POST
Public Administration Necessity of an organization model more rational, enclosing all the 0 variable of a company, as well as the behavior of its employees. III. Growth of the size and the complexity of the companies demanded a model that allowed to a bigger control and direction of its employees and controllers. The theory of the bureaucracy has as initial function to guide and to organize the administrative work. For Chiavenato (2000), based in the model of Weber, the main characteristics are: to i.Carter legal of the norms and regulations; II. Formality in the communication; III. Rationality and division of the work; IV. Impessoalidade in the relations; v.Hierarquia of authority; vi. Estandarizados routines and procedures; vii. Ability technique and meritocracia; viii. Specialization of the administration who is separate of the property; ix. Professionalization of the participants; x.Completa previsibility of functioning; Throughout the years, however, the public administration did not move substantially in compliance with transformation of the administrative theories; she suffered, however, its influences. In reason of the traditional absence of focus in the results, the Public Administration adapta more slowly to the modifications in search of the demanded efficiency. Bresser Pear tree informs that the bureaucracy always was responsible for the administration of the State; it constitutes or integrates the administrative device of the State and for this reason, many times, the State with the proper public bureaucracy is confused. The author affirms, still, that: The public bureaucracy, however, is only one of the social sectors that they search to influence the State. On the other hand, the State is much more of what the simple device or organization: it is the constitutional-legal system - it is the jurisprudence and the organization guarantees that it.